You are currently browsing the monthly archive for September 2007.
I recently had lunch with someone who is thinking about leaving her job. She’s an accomplished professional and the main breadwinner for her family, so this is a major decision. I was in her seat two years ago when I decided to leave AOL. Between my own experience and what I’ve observed and discussed with my friends, I’ve put a lot of thought into this topic, so I’m inspired to start a blog series about it.
Read on and please share your own advice and experience in the comments.
I love a good magazine! My family and I subscribe to a few: Vanity Fair, Newsweek, National Geographic, Washingtonian, Real Simple, Nick Jr. (yikes; I guess that’s several.) I’m not above sneaking a peek at of the National Enquirer in the checkout line, and I consider People magazine to be requirement for any reputable doctor’s office.
My appreciation for magazines does not explain why I receive Lucky magazine on a regular basis. Under no circumstances would I subscribe to a magazine that bills itself as “the magazine about shopping.” I’m a ponytail and crocs kind of gal. I have my days when I aspire to cuteness, but in general I am no fashion plate. I must be fifteen years, three kids, and a minivan outside of Lucky’s target demographic.
I thought that I might have accidentally subscribed to Lucky as part of a free offer, but then my sister started complaining that she, too, was getting Lucky every month (in the periodical sense.) I now believe we are receiving them as part of a pervasive, forest-destroying, misguided marketing campaign; think AOL CD’s for the 2000s.
Lucky is a Conde Nast magazine. These are the folks who publish Wired, Vogue, Glamour, and Vanity Fair, among other magazines. They should know better. Maybe they do; Lucky seems to be a financial success. There are obviously enough disposable income-endowed young shoppers out there to make up for our wasted issues.
I was at a birthday party recently where they served egg- and dairy-free chocolate cake from Whole Foods. It was pretty good, although not any better than the box cakes that I’ve made with dairy and egg substitutions (if I do say so myself!).
The Whole Foods cake was nicely decorated, and the kids there all loved it. If you’re looking for convenience (besides the whole schlepping to Reston thing), this may be a good option for you.
Whole Foods’ cakes are available in yellow and chocolate. Six-inch cakes are $14.99 and Nine-inch cakes are $24.99. They ask for twenty-four hours notice when ordering.
Chantel’s Bakery in Sterling makes an excellent egg-free cake, but it doesn’t come cheap. An eight-inch cake costs $43.95. Perhaps little Johnny would rather have a cake than that new bike…
Here’s an article about Chantel’s bakery from the Observer. According to this article, Chantel’s can bake cakes without soy, gluten, dairy as well. Contact Chantel’s at 703-709-1487.
I’ve never been a huge fan of facials: I find it hard to sit still that long and they often don’t have long-lasting effects that justify their cost. I didn’t have one until I was twenty-seven, and I only had one then because my sister-in-law, Anne, is such a facial advocate. Actually, that’s an understatement. Anne is a militant foot soldier in the holy war against dirty pores.
Anne believes that facials are necessary and to be prized, but be warned: to Anne, a facial should be first and foremost about deep pore cleansing. This means extractions, and they aren’t fun. To Anne, if your facial is all about relaxation and feeling good, you’re wasting your time.
Here is a small fraction of a facial manifesto that Anne emailed me a few years ago. It’s informative and classic Anne: the woman knows facials, plus there’s a happy dash of fanaticism sprinkled throughout.
“… The key for me is how much time she spends on extractions. In 1.5 hour, my facialist spends almost an hour on extractions, but I have a high threshold for this type of pain. Extractions should take at least 1/3 of the time, otherwise the facialist isn’t earning her pay. That’s the hard work, the massage stuff is icing – high value to you and high margins for her, but don’t be fooled – good facials shouldn’t be a relaxing experience– getting clean hurts, baby!
When you call, insist on interviewing the facialist. Ask her how much time she spends on extractions. She’ll tell you it’s totally variable, but you’ve got to get a number! You might say something like, “Well, for someone with normal skin who gets a facial about three times a year, how much time would you estimate spending on extractions?” It’s a red flag if she says less than 20 minutes. Again, high value, high margins, but no clean skin…”
Obviously, facials are not to be taken lightly in our family. The downside to knowing what to expect from a great facial is that I am almost always disappointed. I only go once or twice a year; I never really feel like my skin looks that much better afterwards so I just go in for an annual clean and shine. I’ve never met anyone who comes close to Anne’s super-high standards.
I am thus very happy to report that I received a quite good facial from Amirah Amiri at Amenity Day Spa in Ashburn. When I told her that I wanted to get a really deep cleaning with a lot of time spent on extractions, she was happy to comply.
Communication was the key here. Aestheticians have two big disincentives against deep cleaning: first, it isn’t fun, and they want their clients to come back, and second, it’s hard work.
Amirah did just as I asked, and my skin was noticeably improved afterwards. She earns an endorsement from me, and I think she might even be good enough for a nod from Anne. Contact her at 703-726-8100.
Anyone else got a facialist that they would recommend? Please share!

Recent Comments